Tag Archives: Robert Anton Wilson

The all is one

Who are you? can you define yourself? if so, how do you define yourself, with what values and labels do you use? Do you keep in mind that you cannot be you, without the universe to be exactly like it is now? If you where not in this perfect order of chaos, or the now; where the conditions are exactly like they are now, this current you would never exist.
I found it impossible to post individual moves, as only the whole playlist showed up, whichever videolink i used; I intedet for you to watch the first 4-5 videos 

You did not come into this world, you came out of it. 
You’re a part of this universe, you are not in it. You’re as much nature and natural as anything else. In fact everything that CAN happen, is natural; it can happen in our nature. So the illusion of unnatural events or miracles will simply never happen, because if they do, they are not unnatural or miracles. But one can maybe look at it as minimally likely events, or whatever you desire to put meaning in that type of phenomenon
In fact, you’re a part of the universe experiencing itself, on a scale that’s relatively large or small compared to your standpoint.

This tree would be like this without it's environment, and the environment couldn't be exactly like it is without the tree - Yin and yang
This tree would be like this without it’s environment, and the environment couldn’t be exactly like it is without the tree – Yin and yang

We are all part of this symbiosis, and our actions affect it, we should start to think a little bit more on how to play with, enjoy and take care of our environment/symbiosis. For something “greater” than ourselves as individual beings with desires that so blindly aim for them that they don’t see or care about the aftereffects on the environment, symbiosis or whatever it affects.

This symbolizes the blind fight for greed, the carelessness for others, to enhance oneself and ones lust.
This symbolizes the blind fight for greed, the carelessness for others, to enhance oneself and ones lust.

Are you a robot, or a programmer?

I’m just gonna do a short one tonight, as I’m getting really tired.

How many decisions during the day do you take when being objectively aware of the outcomes of your decisions ?
Do you impulsively choose something you’re familiar and comfortable with, over an opportunity to go out and advance in relationships, exploring new things or basically do stuff you haven’t done before and challenge yourself?

Are you positive for advancement and change “I’m ok”

do you prefer retreat/staying still in comfort “I’m not ok

This is basically describing the 1st circuit from RAWs(Robert Anton Wilson) interpretation of the 8 circuit model.
This model contains a psychological and semanticists of what they thought is nature/genes/inherited  versus nurture/meta programming/environment.
The model also makes you question yourself things that wouldn’t otherwise 
occur or even think of to ask yourself, and most likely shock, over and over again.

If you’re interested in this, you should most definitely check out Prometheus Rising
his is, at the moment, my favorite book. I could even be so arrogant to say that you WILL improve your everyday life if you understand these concept and practice them to an extent.

It can be bought here, there are also some PDF files on the internet, if you want to read it on the pc or a kindle.

This was all i had to give for now, I’ll be back shortly, and I might cover this subject even further.

Is it right to think that something is right?

You’ve probably been in or seen someone arguing over things like: what band, music, clothing style, food or whatever “IS THE BEST”. And when they speak of this they seem to speak out of full 

sales-argumentconfidence, they wont budge, it’s almost like they are in a state to know the “absolute universal truth” about something, and they seem feel so right about it.

For me this way of thinking  works more efficiently for telling how much YOU subjectively think and/or feel about one factor compared to another. Mathematically a 2 dimensional axis.
This, I believe is a phenomena of being a subject to the western logic: Aristotelian logic. Which introduces the concepts of the ethics “right and wrong” That something either is, or it’s not.

I don’t believe this kind of linguistic and model form of “is” alone(extremism) is healthy for a mind which seeks to question one self. Because living like this can and most likely will make you to certain about elements that doesn’t have a ultimate truth.
This will make you gain ignorance I’d rather go without, when asking myself philosophical questions. The matter can always be looked at with objectively, from other angels.

Let me introduce you to a handy tool of mine: E-prime
The idea of this model is to remove all forms of the verb: To be.

I use this to reduce my certainty about an idea, to obtain more “objectivity”, which I believe makes me more receptive and less ignorant about “new” ideas.

In my opinion, uncertain objectivity is better then certain subjectivity when you want to be productive and/or meta-program yourself towards a certain goal.
(Robert Anton Wilson explaining E-prime)

Which brings us to Taoism(Daoism), they take values in the concept that: You cannot have the one without the other, Ying and Yang. You wouldn’t know what pain where and to what dagree it was painfull if you didn’t have a concept/standpoint of the good. 


So the idea is to not be to sure/subjective that it’s one way compared to the other, 

Rather: that it can be both things at the same time as non of them. A more “objective” view.

Maybe you should try some maybe logic, and then you’ll maybe achieve greater objectivity.


There are probably many ways of sending a similar message like i am doing, and a lot of ideas popped up in my head during the making of this post, but there is only so much i want and can put into the subject without going to deep on it. But I’ll go deeper into other subjects later on.